Ruffed GrouseJames Brooks, who writes an outdoorsy column for Johnson City Press, skewered Zach Wamp yesterday for embracing the “junk science” – also known as coal industry 20-year-old spin – that mountaintop removal mining “creates a new habitat that is bird friendly.”

The article is not online yet but here are the highlights:

It was almost 20 years ago, at a convention of the American Birding Association in California, that I first heard an industry spokesperson try to foist off the argument that strip mining creates a new habitat that is bird friendly.

He was hooted and shouted down right on the spot. Normally birders are polite people who listen carefully and then wait for the discussion period. This kind of junk science was such an affront that nobody was willing to wait….

The power industry quickly gave up trying to bamboozle birders with this sort of statistical flimflam…

Almost two decades later, the power industry has finally found someone stupid enough to buy this argument, U.S. Rep. Zach Wamp….

I believe even Wamp, who has crossed swords with bird watchers numerous times in his district, had more sense than to frame his argument to those he has offended throughout his legislative career.

Brooks then explains the difference between desirable birds and the ones Mr. Wamp is referring to like non-native starlings, which “thrive on wasted environments and roosts on powerlines.”

Apparently there is a huge difference and the people in upper East Tennessee know it.

Brooks calls Rep. Wamp a dim bulb, too, probably because he thought calling him a “bird brain” might insult the people who know the difference between a pigeon and a Ruffed Grouse (see picture of said Ruffed Grouse).

UPDATE: Clearly, Mr. Wamp is not in touch with the people. Does anyone besides John Rich and the other 20-percenters living in the state care more about the 10th amendment than they care about a clean water and a healthy eco-system?

  • Share/Bookmark
Tagged with:
 

So this has been quite a week for politics in Tennessee. First, news broke that long-serving West Tennessee congressman John Tanner would not seek re-election in 2010. Almost immediately after that announcement, state senator Roy Herron, who had been doing quite well seeking the Democratic gubernatorial primary nod, announced that he would instead seek the Democratic congressional primary nod in the 8th congressional district. A day later, Ward Cammack announces his withdrawal from the Democratic gubernatorial contest, reducing the number of announced candidates from 5 to 3.

Let’s play political pick up sticks:

Congressman Roy Herron
The first big question is: Why did Roy Herron switch races? Based on the political winds blowing in Tennessee, Phil Bredesen’s unprecedented 95-county sweep was an anomaly unlikely to be repeated by a Democrat for a generation or more (or, probably, any politician). A statewide win for a Democrat in a mid-term election year likely to favor, at least congressionally, the party in opposition to the President would be a hard-fought coup. Especially looking at the fundraising breakdown by party. So for Herron, winning the governor’s mansion, even should he win the Democratic primary, would be difficult. But let’s say that he is, in fact, the frontrunner in Tennessee’s fightin’ 8th. How could he possibly hold the seat as a freshman congressman after the Republican-controlled General Assembly redraws the districts to transform our 5-4 Democratic-majority congressional delegation to a likely 7-2 Republican-majority congressional delegation?

Possible answers:

  • Herron had polling showing that there was no way in hell a Democrat could win the governor’s race, or possibly that he in particular had no way in hell of beating a generic Republican.
  • Herron had polling showing that, actually, despite his public organizing prowess, he was getting thumped in terms of the Democratic primary.
  • Herron had polling showing that he had wanted that congressional seat ever since he was a little boy.
  • Herron somehow wound up in a deal with friends on the other side of the aisle whereby his district wouldn’t get too badly redrawn, giving him a fighting chance of keeping the seat for a decade.
  • Herron had polling from before any other race that demonstrated that his state senate seat was no safer than Tanner’s congressional seat or he knows that he would’ve drawn a stronger challenger than Fincher for his own seat.

Honestly, I can’t see how a long-term view that suggests that less than a single term could possibly be appealing to a state senator in a seat that is assumed to be safe. Is 2 years in Congress better than 4 (or) more years in the state senate? Can Herron somehow become a rare Tanner-like figure who is a legendary Southern Democrat perceived as independent-minded and authentic in a mostly rural part of the state? We probably won’t know the answer till 2012, should Herron best Stephen Fincher, darling of the NRCC. Regardless, I fully expect Herron to emerge as the Democratic frontrunner, even if other Democrats (not named Lowe Finney) emerge to fight in a primary.

Side bet for political poker players: Did Herron and McWherter discuss the Tanner seat? Did each prefer the race he’s now conclusively in? I.e., Herron preferred the Tanner race and McWherter preferred the gubernatorial race?

The Governor’s Club
Herron’s departure lets the other son of Dresden, Mike McWherter, shore up his Northwest Tennessee base. Some have suggested that it advantages Jim Kyle, too, but I don’t see that. The big question will be the fight among all three of McWherter, Kyle, and McMillan for Middle Tennessee supporters, where Herron had a broad base of support, and McWherter just fired a loud opening shot.

Cammack’s departure… well, it’s unlikely to have a meaningful impact. Unless, I suppose, one of the remaining three finds a way to extend Bredesen’s legacy in making Tennessee a green technology center and generally becoming a green policy technocratic candidate.

I hadn’t predicted that the Democratic primary would’ve been particularly brutal with 5 candidates, at least nowhere nearly as brutal as the Republican primary has been and will be. And that’s in part because the Republicans feel the need to perpetually seek Truth in Conservatism, whereas the Democrats have presented as relatively un-bold pragmatists, with frontrunners McWherter (gays) and Herron (God, guns) anchoring some socially conservative points but otherwise generally hoping their ability to connect with a base was likely to determine a winner. I shudder, actually, to think what the general election might look like without Herron, as he was a forceful floor speaker who was probably the most unafraid to take on progressive causes strategically and with charisma. Kyle has no problem on the attack (“Kurita.” “Who?”), so that might be fun, but I’m still waiting for a grand populist (or otherwise) outburst from one of the Democratic contenders that makes running for governor as a Democrat seem like it’s not only fun but also the right thing to do. Otherwise, Bill Haslam, coasting calmly above the wingnut fray, will likely resonate more genuinely with Tennessee voters angling for another Bredesen (a pragmatic administrator coming from a recent background of municipal executive experience) and not disrupt my original prophecy.

  • Share/Bookmark

Zach Wamp: Extremist

Sean Braisted analyzes some recent missives from the gubernatorial candidacy of Zach Wamp and asks, is Zach Wamp offering Tennessee “a style of conservatism that alienates anyone in this state who doesn’t hate everyone who disagrees with them?” That would be a big 10-4, good buddy.

Somehow I’ve managed to get on all the major Republican e-mail lists, and so it goes that today Zach Wamps sends out email touting an upcoming fundraiser hosted by Nashville’s biggest douche-bag John Rich and the self-described “Redneck Woman” Gretchen Wilson. In addition, he is touting the pseudo-support of national rightwing blogger Erick Erickson of Red State:

Erick Erickson, the Editor-in-Chief of the nationally acclaimed conservative blog RedState, wrote an analysis of the Tennessee Governor’s race and said Zach “is a conservative and would govern conservatively.”

In his article, Erickson trashed popular Republican officials like Lamar Alexander and Howard Baker, saying:

For the longest time Tennessee has elected squishy moderates state wide. Howard Baker was conservative, but in a “compromise his mother to advance his goal” sort of way. Arguably Lamar Alexander is even worse, refusing to do anything that does not advance bipartisanship, even at the expense of core conservative goals. Hell, Alexander is not even and does not consider himself to be, a conservative.

Could you imagine a Tennessee Democrat so gleefully touting the endorsement of someone like Markos Moulitsas? Erickson has compared Linda Douglass to Joseph Goebbels and urged Conservatives to beat elected officials to a bloody pulp for regulating dish soap.

  • Share/Bookmark
Tagged with:
 

In what can only be described as a brazen attempt to ride Minnesota Congresswoman Michele Bachman’s coat tails into the Fox News limelight, Tennessee Congressmen Marsha Blackburn and Zach Wamp have signed on to Bachman’s proposed Constitutional amendment that would prevent the Obama administration from replacing the dollar with global funny money:

“The President may not enter into a treaty or other international agreement that would provide for the United States to adopt as legal tender in the United States a currency issued by an entity other than the United States.”

Of course, there is absolutely no such proposal on the table, but that apparently won’t stop Bachman, Blackburn, Wamp, and 27 of their colleagues from getting ready for their closeup on “The Glenn Beck Program” instead of focusing on real problems that need real solutions.

  • Share/Bookmark

Summary: Guests include Hal Cato, president and CEO of Oasis Center, and Peter Canellos, Washington Bureau Chief for the Boston Globe and author of Last Lion: The Fall and Rise of Ted Kennedy .

Part 1 – Dodging a Bullet – News, to do list, is this Daylight Savings Time thingy working for us or against us, Councilman Mike Jameson calls a meeting about Riverfront development, and Councilman Jason Holleman’s storm water amendment. [37.3 MB 23:13 download MP3]

Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.

Independence Day – Martina McBride
Cannonball – The Breeders
See a Little Light – Bob Mould

Part 2 – Interview with Hal Cato – Joining us is Hal cato, president and CEO of Oasis Center, to tell us about their new digs at the Youth Opportunity Center – where Oasis and their partner organizations have banded together to serve young Middle-Tenneseans facing real challenges. Health care, job assistance, counseling, education support, emergency residential services, college counseling, youth leadership opportunities, and even a youth-run business are just some of what they offer all under one roof. [20 MB 12:30 download MP3]

Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.

Philadelphia Freedom – Elton John

Part 3 – The More You Know The more you know the more you are able to make informed decisions based on your values. So it’s surprising that Rep. Stacey Campfield, “Rep. Daddy,” for the sake of this segment, introduced his “Don’t Say Gay” bill which would “prohibit the teaching of or furnishing of materials on human sexuality other than heterosexuality in public school grades K-8.” With this legislation, Rep. Daddy once again introduces an unnecessary bill and makes it clear that if he had kids and they went to public school, all further discussion of important issues would stop once they got home. [14.7 MB 09:10 download MP3]

Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.

People Get Ready – Curtis Mayfield

Part 4 – Interview with Peter Canellos – Peter Canellos is Washington bureau chief of The Boston Globe and editor of Last Lion: The Fall and Rise of Ted Kennedy, the newly published biography of Ted Kennedy by the team at the Globe. It’s all in there – his brothers and the Kennedy mystique, Chappaquiddick, universal health care, his political legacy, and the relationship between Kennedy and President Obama. Plus, we get his thoughts on the state of journalism in the digital era and a down economy. [26.4MB 16:29 download MP3]

Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.

We’re in Yr Corner – Cornershop (album: When I Was Born For The 7th Time)
The Step and the Walk – The Duke Spirit (album: Neptune)

Part 5 – Our Ears are Marked by a Conservative Caller – Who tries to spread the lie that President Obama promised during his campaign to stop earmark spending and is breaking that promise by signing the spending bill currently being considered in the Senate. We miss Elbert but we don’t need him for a smackdown. [8.8MB 5:31 download MP3]

Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.

Part 6 – Making the Sausage is Hard – So some legislators take the easy way out by making complex issues appear in stark black and white so they can present them cynically to their constituents. Congressman Zach Wamp (R-TN) went on national TV and did it with the issue of Universal healthcare (we replay the audio), and Rep. Debra Maggart did it with an abortion bill (which is why we’re once again having a difficult conversation about abortion). [25:13MB 40:04 download MP3]

Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.

  • Share/Bookmark

In a statement released this afternoon, Bill Frist opened the floodgates for Republican gubernatorial hopefuls and kept the door closed for his own presidential ambitions by confirming that he will not run for governor in Tennessee in 2010.

Who will be the Republican hopefuls?

  • Zach Wamp: The congressman from the fighting 3rd has basically been telling Frist to shit or get off the pot for weeks. I’m sure I’m not the only Tennessean who has noticed his self-promoting mug on billboards prominently placed along I-40 the farther East one gets in Tennessee. His shrewd pre-emptive waste management of his nose candy problem was almost Obama-esque, but is he too zealous?
  • Bill Haslam: Haslam has a head-down reputation for competent governance of Tennessee’s pre-Appalachian outpost, and he’s less of a lightning rod than former Knoxville mayor Victor Ashe.
  • Bill Gibbons: I’ll confess to knowing least about Gibbons other than that he has confessed interest in the race as a Republican.
  • Marsha Blackburn: The only female congressman in Tennessee, the newly feminist and ever-ambitious ex-stylist Marsha Marsha Marsha has her work cut out for her in accessing the same base Wamp is likely to court, especially after a healthy challenge from her right by Tom Leatherwood in 2008’s Republican primary. Word in the mythical backrooms is that the Baker boys aren’t fond of her. Her ambition more than conventional wisdom leave her on the list. Rep. Beth Harwell’s recent deferral to Mumpower keeps her off for now.

The real wildcard here will be whether this is a replay of the 2006 U.S. Senate Republican primary, where two conservatives (Bryant, Hilleary) pave the way for a moderate (Corker), or whether two moderates pave the way for a conservative. Will Gibbons enter the fray as a moderate or a conservative (particularly of the social variety)? I’m expecting Haslam to lean moderate, although he could (unpleasantly) surprise me.

Haslam stands to out-Bresdesen Bredesen by campaigning as a pragmatic fiscally responsible executive able to build alliances with rather than alienate core members of his party but able to be a sincere bipartisan operator at the same time.

The other big winner from today’s news is Democratic state senator Andy Berke. Having recently been the best promoter of Democratic ideas in the state, he stands well poised to emerge from what will probably be a small field of legitimate Democratic contenders if the U.S. Senate primary is any gauge of Democratic interest in statewide office.

Honestly, I don’t know if there will be any other serious contenders than former state representative (and first woman Majority Leader) Kim McMillan, and I’ll be interested to see how she makes the case, other than explicitly, that someone who previously supported a state income tax can win statewide office in Tennessee. Is it possible that a pro-income-tax progressive consensus could emerge that could push her past Berke’s redefinition of Democrats? I see that as almost as unlikely as her using her past support as an asset rather than a liability in the first place.

I suppose I should mention Lincoln Davis, as he has done some preliminary positioning. His name being in the hat would certainly increase tensions about the direction of the party. Having treated Obama in the Republican-lite mode, his was not an uncommon approach to Democratic presidential punditry in Tennessee, and that mode hasn’t served the party well at the ballot box since we’re in a state flush with real live Republicans who are certainly not fat-free.

And it almost pains me to mention Harold Ford, Jr. because I haven’t seen any indication that he’s serious about governance, although his name has come up in conversations about the race. I’m hopeful that Frist’s bowing out doesn’t increase the prospects that HaFo enters the race.

As much as I’d like to see the Democratic primary campaign generate broader statewide interest, I suspect that, should Haslam demonstrate grade-A gangsterism in the Republican primary, the race will be his to lose. The post-Kurita TNDP is unlikely to find a revolutionary in either Charles Robert Bone or Chip Forrester that truly speaks to Lamar!’s grand divisions broadly, so the rebuilding of the state party is likely to take more than a single election cycle, especially after the presidential, U.S. Senate, and General Assembly races we witnessed in 2008. And with Andy Berke one of few people in Tennessee Democratic politics willing to play the game on someone other than Bill Hobbs’s turf, the number of skilled messengers is likely to remain too few to allow him a realistic shot at the governor’s mansion. Regardless, I’d like to see a spirited contest between him and McMillan, as I think they might be able to point the way for the next iteration of the TNDP, especially since each will be based outside of Nashville.

SEE ALSO: Kleinheider

  • Share/Bookmark

Today’s Tennessean has a doozy: “Tennessee Republicans commend Bush’s legacy.”

I thought it was a typo. Surely they must have meant, “Tennessee Republicans condemn Bush’s legacy,” right? But no, there they are – U.S. Rep. Zach Wamp, former Tennessee Sen. Howard Baker, Lt. Gov. Ron Ramsey, Tennessee Republican Party chairwoman Robin Smith, and U.S. Rep. Marsha Blackburn – paying homage, making excuses, and blaming others.

At a time when the vast majority of Americans see the presidency of George W. Bush for what it is – disastrous for the country – Tennessee’s elected Republicans see it quite differently. They have chosen to rewrite history and fault not the President for his failed policies but the White House communications department (a group of people who have no real responsibility for making actual decisions vital to well-being of the nation) for how they presented them. As a group, they seem to be part of a minority who will cling to ideology and rhetoric and Rovian “attack, don’t defend” tactics.

Here’s a particular gem from Rep. Wamp:

The way they communicated the response to Hurricane Katrina left everyone puzzled and wondering if they could even respond. What they communicated was much worse, just showing the president flying over the damage. This is a man who would relish getting into the water and getting people out of the water. But the way they handled it made it look like he wasn’t engaged. They didn’t make him look like the compassionate leader he is. This is a man who loves to cut wood and sweat, and it didn’t come through. People lost confidence.

As much as President Bush would “relish getting into the water and getting people out of the water,” he didn’t, you know, get into the water. He did, however, fly over the damage. So which is perception and which is reality? And which is more important to the well-being of the people of the nation?

At a time when most of the country, and its elected leaders, have acknowledged the need for a change from not only the last eight years of President Bush, but also the kind of politics that have divided us for so long, it’s just more of the same from Tennessee Republicans.

It’s going to be a long two years.

  • Share/Bookmark