David Gregory convened a health care reform panel this morning on Meet the Press with Tom Daschle, Dick Armey, Rachel Maddow, and Sen. Tom Coburn. Coburn called the American health care system “one of the best in the world.” Daschle fought valiantly to get a word in about real policy. Armey shouted about “MoveOn.org” whenever he felt threatened. And Maddow did her best to dismantle Armey’s lies. It was frustrating to hear Coburn and Armey, who I’m sure both have very good health insurance, argue cooly about the cost of reform while completely ignoring the moral imperative we have to fix the system.

But the most frustrating part was listening to Coburn say on a national news program that there is “no indicator anywhere in this country that the quality of medicine has declined” one hour, and then reading about the health care services provided free by a Remote Area Medical field hospital to thousands in Los Angeles who can’t get them otherwise the next:

They came in their thousands, queuing through the night to secure one of the coveted wristbands offering entry into a strange parallel universe where medical care is a free and basic right and not an expensive luxury. Some of these Americans had walked miles simply to have their blood pressure checked, some had slept in their cars in the hope of getting an eye-test or a mammogram, others had brought their children for immunisations that could end up saving their life.

In the week that Britain’s National Health Service was held aloft by Republicans as an “evil and Orwellian” example of everything that is wrong with free healthcare, these extraordinary scenes in Inglewood, California yesterday provided a sobering reminder of exactly why President Barack Obama is trying to reform the US system.

The LA Forum, the arena that once hosted sell-out Madonna concerts, has been transformed – for eight days only – into a vast field hospital. In America, the offer of free healthcare is so rare, that news of the magical medical kingdom spread rapidly and long lines of prospective patients snaked around the venue for the chance of getting everyday treatments that many British people take for granted.

In the first two days, more than 1,500 men, women and children received free treatments worth $503,000 (£304,000). Thirty dentists pulled 471 teeth; 320 people were given standard issue spectacles; 80 had mammograms; dozens more had acupuncture, or saw kidney specialists. By the time the makeshift medical centre leaves town on Tuesday, staff expect to have dispensed $2m worth of treatments to 10,000 patients.

Health insurance company whistle-blower Wendell Potter told us about the life-changing experience he had after seeing a field hospital in action and a 60 Minutes segment showed the pain in the faces of the people who were turned away. These people whose only access to health care is through these randomly scheduled appearances of field hospitals in their community are not the faces of a “best in the world” system. Tom Coburn is, though. Lucky man.

  • Share/Bookmark
Tagged with:
 
Ewwwwwwww.

Ewwwwwwww.

Here’s a new one for the Urban Dictionary:

The Coburn: Invoking privilege or any other tool in your profession’s arsenal to protect your buddy from exposing additional hot and steamy details about his embarrassing extra-marital affair.

Freddie brought this Post Politics (not that one, the other one) “The Fix” chat to my attention this morning and my exasperated response was one he has heard frequently before, oh good night nurse.

I’m just speculating here but my guess is that Sen. Tom Coburn (R-NOT OK) is on the wrong side of most women’s health issues. You know, the kind of issues where certain decisions about a women’s health and reproductive health should be “cloaked by patient-doctor confidentiality.”

Oh yes. Here we go. These are Senator Coburn’s positions on issues that apply to the health and reproductive well-being of half the population:

1) He opposes abortion even in cases of rape. For instance, he voted no to an amendment to a bill that would “strike the provisions in the bill which would permit individual states to determine whether to use Medicaid funds to pay for abortions in cases of rape or incest.”
2) He sponsored a bill to limit access to RU-486.
3) He infamously said: “I favor the death penalty for abortionists and other people who take life.”
4) He voted no on to “expand access to preventive health care services that reduce unintended pregnancy (including teen pregnancy), reduce the number of abortions, and improve access to women’s health care.”

So let’s recap.

Decisions made between a man and his doctor that would reveal torrid details about said man’s extra-marital affair should remain private but decisions made between a woman and her doctor about medically necessary reproductive health procedures should be open to any old white man sitting up in Congress?

Oh, I so do not think so.

  • Share/Bookmark

Looking for something?

Use the form below to search the site:

Still not finding what you're looking for? Drop a comment on a post or contact us so we can take care of it!

Visit our friends!

A few highly recommended friends...