They say a good impressionist can get inside his subject’s head. If that’s the case, then Stewart has finally mastered his George W. Bush.
Watching Dana Perino’s last press briefing was almost as painful as watching President Bush’s speech last night (President Einsenhower, he ain’t).
In her final moments as President Bush’s Press Secretary, Perino dissed colleague Scott McClellan, displayed her blind allegiance to President Bush, and made it clear that she believes everything Sean Hannity says about the liberal bias in the media.
The room grew hushed with anticipation when Jim Axelrod, the CBS correspondent, asked Ms. Perino what she really thought of the media, and if President Bush had been subjected to bias.
“Here’s the thing,” she said. “I don’t think that I would always be asked about my feelings about liberal bias in the media if there wasn’t any liberal bias in the media.”
Mr. Axelrod interrupted. “For the record,” he said, “I just asked about bias.”
Over the years, when people referred to Bush loyalists as “drinking the kool-aid,” I always thought it was a metaphor. Now I think there’s something in the White House water. What else could explain why Perino – who lives in the same country we do, as far as I can tell – can’t see the damage done by this man. How can these drinkers of colored sugar water allow him to shirk responsibility for the current State of the Union (which, by the way, can’t possibly be described as “strong” or “very Strong” now).
In a post earlier in the week I referred to Trickle Down Victimization, in which conservatives – from George Bush to Tennessee’s own Robin Smith – would rather play the victim than take responsibility or action. Perino’s response has to be yet another example of this phenomenon. Or maybe it’s Stockholm syndrome. Or some potent witchy love spell. Either way, after watching President Bush participate in the Karl Rove orchestrated “Bush Legacy Project” over the last few weeks, which culminated in last night’s farewell speech, its clear that she is under the spell of a narcissistic man who doesn’t listen to criticism, doesn’t care that this country is worse off in every measurable way than it was 8 years ago, and is enjoying his exit like a rock star enjoys a promo tour.
Charlie Gibson, ABC News, on December 1, 2008: What were you most unprepared for?
BUSH: Well, I think I was unprepared for war. In other words, I didn’t campaign and say, “Please vote for me, I’ll be able to handle an attack.” In other words, I didn’t anticipate war. Presidents — one of the things about the modern presidency is that the unexpected will happen.
Except that during the pre-9/11 2000 Presidential campaign he relentlessly did just that.
Secondly, as president, I will protect America from – America itself from missiles and blackmail. In a time of technology and terror, the defense of our homeland must be an urgent goal.
Both the President and the vice president have repeatedly said, during their march into history, that they did not govern at the whim of polls. But polls are a valuable measure of the health of the country and in our democracy, public opinion matters. Elected official have a responsibility to not only listen to public opinion but persuade us that their ideas are good ones.
Their hubris, not to mention President Bush’s delusion, is insulting.
Larry King, CNN, 1/14/09: No, but do you ever have a moment of feeling where it was wrong?
President Bush: No. I was – what I was worried Iraq was going to fail, not Iraq was wrong – that Iraq is going to fail. And that’s why I put 30,000 troops in when a lot of people were saying get out. And the surges worked. And a young democracy in the heart of the Middle East has taken hold. And, obviously, there’s more work to be done. But Al Qaeda has been denied the – you know, the base from which they wanted to operate.
While he continues his history revisions and continues to conflate Iraq with Afghanistan and Saudi Arabia – none of the hijackers were Iraqi and Al Qaeda didn’t exist in Iraq until after we invaded – he leaves not a “young democracy in the heart of the Middle East” but a democratically elected Hamas, a moderate Iranian President replaced by the reactionary and hateful Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, a pissed off Lebanon and Syria, over 4225 dead U.S. servicemen and women, 167 who died of self-inflicted wounds, over 30,000 wounded, hundreds of thousands of dead Iraqis, countless others maimed and injured, millions more displaced from their homes and living as refugees, a seething hot spot, and who knows how many angry young relatives hell-bent on revenge. In other words, we have no idea what, or who, will come at us from his “young democracy” and inflamed Middle East.
President Bush and Vice President Cheney say they don’t follow polls. But would they pay attention to one that asked the American people if they feel more or less safe than they did eight years ago?
At long last, President Bush’s narcissitic farewell tour is over. Only three and change more days until we have a President who uses the inclusive “We” more than reflexive “I.”
Today’s Tennessean has a doozy: “Tennessee Republicans commend Bush’s legacy.”
I thought it was a typo. Surely they must have meant, “Tennessee Republicans condemn Bush’s legacy,” right? But no, there they are – U.S. Rep. Zach Wamp, former Tennessee Sen. Howard Baker, Lt. Gov. Ron Ramsey, Tennessee Republican Party chairwoman Robin Smith, and U.S. Rep. Marsha Blackburn – paying homage, making excuses, and blaming others.
At a time when the vast majority of Americans see the presidency of George W. Bush for what it is – disastrous for the country – Tennessee’s elected Republicans see it quite differently. They have chosen to rewrite history and fault not the President for his failed policies but the White House communications department (a group of people who have no real responsibility for making actual decisions vital to well-being of the nation) for how they presented them. As a group, they seem to be part of a minority who will cling to ideology and rhetoric and Rovian “attack, don’t defend” tactics.
Here’s a particular gem from Rep. Wamp:
The way they communicated the response to Hurricane Katrina left everyone puzzled and wondering if they could even respond. What they communicated was much worse, just showing the president flying over the damage. This is a man who would relish getting into the water and getting people out of the water. But the way they handled it made it look like he wasn’t engaged. They didn’t make him look like the compassionate leader he is. This is a man who loves to cut wood and sweat, and it didn’t come through. People lost confidence.
As much as President Bush would “relish getting into the water and getting people out of the water,” he didn’t, you know, get into the water. He did, however, fly over the damage. So which is perception and which is reality? And which is more important to the well-being of the people of the nation?
At a time when most of the country, and its elected leaders, have acknowledged the need for a change from not only the last eight years of President Bush, but also the kind of politics that have divided us for so long, it’s just more of the same from Tennessee Republicans.
It’s going to be a long two years.
On a lazy Sunday afternoon, I just finished reading Ron Suskind’s The Way of the World: A Story of Truth and Hope in an Age of Extremism, and it is most assuredly a must-read. The layering of the narrative is absorbing, and, like its predecessor, The One Percent Doctrine: Deep Inside America’s Pursuit of Its Enemies Since 9/11
it reads like a suspense thriller. The most frightening part is reaching the end and realizing that Suskind is a purveyor of fact, not fiction.
I recently read a snarky semi-review of the book by Clive Crook in an analysis of one of the book’s most damning revelations: that the Bush administration forged an intelligence document from a former Iraqi intelligence chief who, in the reality-based community, had told the White House that there were no WMD in Iraq. The forged document fabricated a relationship between Iraq and al-Qaeda as directed by our White House. Unfortunately, Crook, whom I imagine regards himself as an intellectual, dispenses with the luxuries the book takes in contemporary cultural examination, and seems to have wanted instead a breathless 500-word exposé of a single fact among the many supplied by the book. I’m not dismissing the importance of this or similar and singular facts in the book. Indeed, they make me aghast at how poor our notion of ethics and accountability has become.
For my part, though, I much prefer the view into the life of an Afghan teen participant in a program of the American Councils for International Education; an opportunity to witness the last days of Benazir Bhutto; and the intelligence-community optimism of Rolf Mowatt-Larssen, who recognizes better than anyone in the Bush administration the urgent need to work on non-proliferation. America’s quest to reduce our information to ideologically isolated tweets is causing us to do ourselves and the world a disservice. Every narrative explored by Suskind here is critical to the “human progress” he presents in the sibling tension between two Pakistanis coming to grips with their relationships with each other and with Islam.
The world presented by Suskind in his two most recent books is one with dark, dark clouds casting a shadow across America and the Middle East. In the end, though, I can’t help but read optimism between his urgent and fact-laden lines. I have had a hard time not living with a quiet fear after having read The One Percent Doctrine, which ends ominously. None of the narratives of The Way of the World end happily, in my opinion, but somehow the book itself sounds a hopeful note as it closes. And finishing it on the virtual eve of possibly the most critical election of my lifetime causes me to look to Election Day for a better understanding of how I’ll see the world in a few short months: with hope or fear.
I can’t recommend Suskind’s writing highly enough. If you ever get the opportunity to see him speak in person, avail yourself of it. The only modern narrator of the complex issues of our times I have read and admire with the same capacity is Paul Berman, whose A Tale of Two Utopias: The Political Journey of the Generation of 1968 was a fascinating analysis of a world and era I can never know, the 1960s, and its connection to the world I inhabit today.
Suskind’s personal website is a nice repository of supplements to his journalistic efforts in book form. His elaboration on the events of the 21st century thus far is the sort of thing that makes the sensationalism splayed across the entry ways to modern bookstores simply depressing. Suskind is a journalist’s journalist, and Tim Russert’s recent death in advance of the audacity of the McCain-Palin media strategy, makes me realize just how rare such individuals are in our era.
Hundreds of thousands dead, maimed and psychologically scared, millions displaced from their homelands, and $700 Billion Dollars of Debt, and we’re back to where we were on 9/11. The GAO issued a report this month stating that “the United States has not met its national security goals to destroy terrorist threats and close the safe haven in Pakistan’s FATA [Federally Administered Tribal Areas]….” They also found “broad agreement, as documented in the National Intelligence Estimate, State, and embassy documents, as well as Defense officials in Pakistan, that al Qaeda had regenerated its ability to attack the United States and had succeeded in establishing a safe haven in Pakistan’s FATA.”
I would blame everyone who voted for George Bush in 2000 and 2004 but as Frank Rich reminded us on Sunday, the democratic ticket beat Bush-Cheney in Pennsylvania by 205,000 votes in 2000 and 144,000 votes in 2004. And those were just the votes that were counted. Factor in the millions that weren’t and you have a decidedly Democratic victory. If we want progress in this country and an end to our foreign policy madness, we better keep an eye on who’s counting the votes come November 2008.
But I digress. Rep. Howard Berman (D-Calif.), chairman of the House Foreign Affairs Committee, will hold a hearing on May 7 to examine the GAO’s findings and “discuss actions that a new U.S. administration can take to reconstitute our foreign policy in this region, to refocus our efforts on eliminating terrorist threats there, and to rebuild our relationship with the Pakistani people.” Find all the members of the committee, including Ron Paul, here.
“Highest disapproval rating ever guy.”
Could also be Low approval rating guy, Worst president ever guy, President Low Point, and Turd Blossom.
You want to talk about bitter? OK, let’s talk about bitter.
- I’m bitter that the news most people watch and the news most people read chooses to report on ill-chosen words of one presidential candidate rather than the disastrous foreign policy views of another (Oh, really, John McCain, Sadr’s “influence has been on the wane for a long time?” And is he a Sunni or a Shia, sir?).
- I’m bitter that the news most people watch and the news most people read chooses to report on ill-chosen words of one presidential candidate rather than the Bush administration’s deliberate attempt to cover their torture-monkey asses with legal briefs.
- I’m bitter that my government chooses torture over moral superiority.
- I’m bitter that five years ago “major combat operations” were declared over.
- I’m bitter that only 28 percent of Americans know the number of American casualties in Iraq.
- I’m bitter that no one knows the real number of Iraqi civilian casualties.
- I’m bitter that as the war in Iraq rages on, the guys in charge choose to represent “significant progress” with charts and graphs while ignoring the carnage on the ground.
- I’m bitter that 17 of the nation’s 50 largest cities have high school graduation rates lower than 50 percent.
- I’m bitter that 1 in every 100 Americans is incarcerated.
- I’m bitter that we spend $435 million a day, $3 billion a week, $12 billion a month, on the Iraq war and nothing to improve the education or the lives of our citizens.
- I’m bitter that I can’t be critical of our government’s policies and leaders – you know, the people that work for us – without being told that I should love my country more or move to Cuba.
- I’m bitter that I can’t get close enough to Dick Cheney to wag my finger in his face in response to “So?”
- I’m bitter that more people in Tennessee, including some legislators, choose to care about the integrity of the lottery instead of the integrity of our elections.
- I’m bitter that we’re still lagging behind (“studying the science?) instead of leading on global climate change.
- I’m bitter that there are still some adults in this country who believe it better to attack those who ask the hard questions about race rather than have meaningful conversations.
- I’m bitter that these adults have radio and televisions shows where they get to spew their nonsense to millions of people.
- I’m bitter that people have such short memories that Fox News can get away with this s**t.
And so, is it surprising then that I cling to my martinis and my Constitution and my antipathy towards a government who doesn’t represent my values as a way to deal with my frustrations?
UPDATE: Thank you, Robert Reich (and hat tip to Freddie), for being more eloquent than I and spot on with your blog post, “Obama, Bitterness, Meet the Press, and the Old Politics.”
Dana Perino is so uncomfortable answering for President Bush’s crimes against humanity that I almost feel sorry for her. Almost. Because what was the president doing on the day the 4000th soldier was killed in Iraq? Sure, he may have gone to church – after all, it was Easter Sunday – but he was also yukking it up with a 6-foot tall dude in a bunny suit. Shame on him.
And what did he say earlier in the month to our troops stationed in Afghanistan, where almost 500 of them have perished?
“I must say, I’m a little envious,” Bush said. “If I were slightly younger and not employed here, I think it would be a fantastic experience to be on the front lines of helping this young democracy succeed….It must be exciting for you … in some ways romantic, in some ways, you know, confronting danger. You’re really making history, and thanks.”
Well, at least he remembered to say thank you. His mother must be so proud.


Recent Comments