No, the guitar doesn't help.

No, the guitar doesn't help.

Today, ex-AlabamaArkansas Governor and failed Presidential Candidate Mike Huckabee endorsed Pat Marsh, the Republican candidate for Tennessee State House District 62 (Election day is Tuesday, Oct. 13). Tennessee Democratic Party Chairman Chip Forrester suggests that the endorser should have vetted the endorsee a little bit better:

“Mike Huckabee might be surprised to know that Pat Marsh voted either for Barack Obama or Hillary Clinton in the presidential primary last year, not for him,” Tennessee Democratic Party Chairman Chip Forrester said. “And Mr. Huckabee probably should have asked more questions of Mr. Marsh before endorsing him, given the Republican presidential candidate’s hard-line stance on certain moral issues.

“It would have been easier for Pat Marsh to clear up where he stands on the issues by debating Ty Cobb on Saturday. Instead, Mr. Marsh chose to dodge that debate and ask for an endorsement from someone who doesn’t even live in Tennessee. Mr. Marsh’s campaign is obviously falling apart.

“I’m afraid Mr. Marsh’s credibility is in need of some immediate repair after all the bad advice he has taken lately from the clueless Republican leadership in Nashville,” Forrester added.

Excellent point.

But the endorsee should have also vetted the endorser. It appears that Huckabee has a reputation for being motivated by money, lying about his faith-based credentials to further his career, and urging his fellow Christians to keep women in their place.

In early 2009, Mike Huckabee made an appearance to endorse and raise money for an Alabama GOP House candidate, Les Phillip. Phillip raised some money but “the FEC shows his campaign spent $43,611 to get Huck there and put on a good show.”

His disbursements include a $33,990 speaking fee for Huckabee, $600 for photography for the Huckabee event, $438 for a lunch with Huckabee, $6,233 for a stage rental and equipment (presumably for the Huckabee event), and a $2,350 facility rental fee (also presumably for the Huckabee event).

When Huckabee was running for President, he claimed he would be strong on terrorism because had a theology degree. Turns out, he was lying about his faith-based credentials:

After the news conference with Ed Rollins in Concord, NH, Huckabee and Rollins, his new national campaign manager, took some questions. The last question was about a Powerline blog, a conservative blog, story that he did not, in fact, have a theology degree, as he has claimed. Here is Huckabee’s response:

“I have a bachelor of arts in religion and a minor in communications in my undergraduate work. And then I have 46 hours on a master’s degree at Southwestern Theology Seminary. So, my degree as a theological degree is at the college level and then 46 hours toward a masters — three years of study of New Testament Greek, and then the rest of it, all in Seminary was theological studies, but my degree was actually in religion.”

Here’s what Huckabee said in a Christian Broadcasting Network interview:
“I’m as strong on terror as anybody. In fact I think I’m stronger than most people because I truly understand the nature of the war that we are in with Islamofascism. These are people that want to kill us. It’s a theocratic war. And I don’t know if anybody fully understands that. I’m the only guy on that stage with a theology degree. I think I understand it really well.”

And ladies, Governor Huckabee loves you, as long as you know your place.

See you at the polls!

More from NoChaser.

  • Share/Bookmark
Tagged with:
 

Jonathan Alter of Newsweek has an illuminating piece up about the thing that will matter more at the Democratic National Convention than media cycles or momentum: delegates–specifically pledged delegates. Alter’s conclusion, based on very generous delegate math (including Michigan and Florida), leaves Hillary as little better than a Huckabee with the benefit of proportional representation. Think not? He encourages you to do the math with Slate’s Delegate Calculator.

To me, this strengthens yet another aspect of my ticket prediction for the Democrats.

  • Share/Bookmark

As 2007 drew to a close, I was making unverifiable assertions to friends and associates not to discount Mike Huckabee as a dark horse among the Republican presidential nominees. As 2008 opened, I declared on air (free bumper sticker to the careful listener who can help me figure out which podcast it’s in) that John McCain would be the Republican nominee. Now, I don’t have the public track record of a Sarcastro, and I haven’t been willing to put my money where my mouth is on Intrade, but I am willing to offer my predictions for the general election.

Democrats
Because the Democrats use a presidential preference system where everybody’s opinion matters a little, and because they have two candidates who are tearing at the seams of a generational gap rather than at the policy soul of the party, Sens. Obama and Clinton will find themselves on the single ticket that Wolf Blitzer dangled in front of cable audiences everywhere during their first head-to-head match-up at a debate in California. Obama, after surprising in Texas, will be at the head of the ticket, but because the Clintons, like political cockroaches, cannot be finished off, the superdelegates will negotiate the equivalent of a plea bargain on Hillary’s behalf. You heard it here: Obama/Clinton ‘08. Dream ticket or nightmare? You make the call.

Republicans
John McCain, per my earlier prediction, is already the presumptive nominee. Now he just needs a running mate. He’ll find it in Tim Pawlenty, the Republican governor of Minnesota. A recent Politico article makes the case nicely, but I’ve had my eye on this “rising star” ever since he received the blessing of Karl Rove a few years back. An old edition of The Note picks up on this tidbit:

“Eibensteiner said that he had invited Rove ‘a long time ago’ to appear at a state party organization fundraiser, but that Rove said he preferred to help Pawlenty’s campaign specifically.”

If you think anything Karl Rove says/does is a coincidence, think again. McCain/Pawlenty ‘08

Inaugural Address 2009
John McCain. Having deftly parried Obama’s Generation Next caché with Pawlenty’s disarming youthful conservatism, McCain stands aside as the Republican attack machine and dominance of terrestrial radio eviscerate Hillary and Clintonism, as well as Obama’s Kennedyesque (read: inexperienced) sheen. Get ready for four more wars!

Decision 2012
At age 75, John McCain decides not to seek a second term, and Tim Pawlenty becomes disturbingly difficult to dislodge from the White House. He’s like a Mike Huckabee who believes in evolution–charming and disarming and a natural political talent. Who said Karl Rove’s vision of a long-term Republican majority was over?

In Conclusion
There’s a chance that Obama is a defter political talent than anyone could’ve foreseen and actually beats back the Clinton machine in the superdelegate mythical backroom. If he does so, look for another woman (maybe Janet Napolitano or Kathleen Sebelius, both of whom come with the benefit of executive experience and important regional constituencies) on the ticket.

There’s also a chance that Clinton’s inevitability turns out to be as strong as McCain’s, and she ekes out an earned delegate win. In which case, you’ll find a Clinton/Obama ticket. The Clintons might stand ready to tear apart the party to get back in the White House (such as if Obama winds up with more earned delegates), but they’re not stupid enough to commit a political homicide/suicide by getting rid of Obama’s next generation political machine when they’re calling the shots.

Right now, the only way I see the Democrats losing in 2008 is if Hillary is on the ticket. And the only way I see Hillary not being on the ticket is if there’s a wholesale rejection of neo-Clintonism as not-self on the part of a cresting wave of superdelegates after the Mar. 4th or maybe May 6th states have had their say.

March madness, indeed.

  • Share/Bookmark