“Must See TV” is back on (MS)NBC with Rachel Maddow, who is doing amazing work. Her appearance on Meet the Press last Sunday was stunning when she held Rep. Aaron Schock (R-Ill.) accountable for “railing against a spending bill in public while touting its benefits in his home district:”
Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy
And last night she continued shining her special brand of sunshine on the Republican legislators who simultaneously praise the good results of stimulus dollars with their hands out for more while tearing down the stimulus bill because…well, because of the good results and their willingness to destroy the country to take back even just a little bit of power:
I couldn’t find any demo breakdown in your link, or geographic breakdown. If you have a better link, please share. There’s no doubting Fox is the superior network in terms of ratings — kind of like McDonald’s being the superior restaurant in terms of profit. The lowest-common demoniator is always a good investment, even if it’s not necessarily good for the masses.
But I still maintain MSNBC might be the better ad buy in certain markets. Lower ad rates. More percentage of viewers with actual buying power.
Donna, I congratulate you on a four-sentence post. And a quote. And a link (even if it is irrelevant…). You and I might even become friends.
BTW, where is Ryan? I genuinely hope he is well.
“In major markets, MSNBC is very competitive among the 18-54 crowd.”
I don’t think so. Show the numbers. I believe it is in dead last place. Or second to last.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/06/25/fox-news-averaging-about-_n_220659.html
Granted, it would be marginal, but not insignificant.
Yeah, Fox kills MSNBC in eastern Kansas and northern Texas. Obliterates them. But MSNBC holds its own even in southern metro areas like Nashville and Atlanta. So while Fox advertisers make a killing in Shelbyville or Pulaski, MSNBC is probably the better buy in Nashville.
really now,how much would her numbers go up if Every one 18-54 in rural areas without cable or sat tuned in?
MSNBC’s “low ratings” are skewed significantly by the fact by most rural cable companies don’t have them on their basic tier, if at all.
In major markets, MSNBC is very competitive among the 18-54 crowd.
You don’t see many people singing her praises because the network’s viewership is so weak. But that doesn’t mean she isn’t doing something closer to journalism than any of the Hannitys, Olbermanns, etc. I find that I learn more from her show than any of her competitors, and she tends to back it up with facts that I can go and verify myself. I hope she gets a better audience because we need more people willing to ask tough questions.
Most of the others are just trying to reinforce the worldview of their predetermined audience and it’s usually presented at a 4th grade level. I’ll keep watching as long as her show can survive on the wasteland of MSNBC.
And that reason would be … she’s the smartest person on TV today (and it’s not even close). Of course, Rachel’s brain and wit speak for themselves.
Donna, I’m so glad you’ve seen the light on this issue! Thank goodness. Perhaps you’ll side with the American people on more issues and support health care. Perhaps you’ll reject the whites-only teabaggers. Perhaps you’ll give us coherent postings of more than two sentences.
Yay! Peace in the valley, y’all!
You don’t see many people signing Ms. Maddow’s praises. With good reason.
[...] finding more and more evidence that Republicans – on both the state and federal level – are on the ground taking [...]
[...] finding more and more evidence that Republicans – on both the state and federal level – are on the ground taking [...]