Go ahead, Google Obama Youth. I dare you.

Go ahead, Google Obama Youth. I dare you.

Michael DelGiorno continues his irresponsible broadcasting today on 99.7 WTN, firing up parents of school-aged children by applying historically combustible rhetoric to President Obama, and then sending these highly agitated parents to your kids’ schools.

Next Tuesday, President Barack Obama will deliver a national address to the students of in public schools across the country to encourage the kids, as a letter from Secretary of Education Arne Duncan states on the Ed.gov website, to “challenge students to work hard, set educational goals, and take responsibility for their learning.”

Age appropriate follow-up discussions and activities have also been set up for kids in grades K-6 and 7- 12.

And away DelGiorno goes. But not before prefacing his fear-not-fact-based harangue against President Obama’s address to classrooms with this:

“By the way, may I say that doing this, in and of itself…there’s nothing wrong with that if the President sticks to the text we are being pre-given. There’s nothing wrong with that. The motive? The real agenda? And oh, by the way, the real curriculum behind it? Might be troubling. Here. Follow the bouncing ball.”

The subtext is, of course, “don’t look at the facts, listen to my insinuations and snide tone and be very afraid because the bogeyman is out to get your children.”

So believing it his purpose in life to drag everything down into the gutter with him, DelGiorno then used a good portion of his 3-hour radio show yesterday to sully President Obama’s address. Sandwiched between words llike “Hitler,” “indoctrinating,” and “scary stuff,” he said the following:

  • Barack Obama was going to “seize control of the internet”
  • Barack Obama will “keep everybody’s name and archive them who speak ill of his policies”
  • “I don’t need the President to raise my kids”
  • The first time any president has “spoken in secret on the internet directly to people’s kids”
  • “Public education is not about education anymore it’s about indoctrination, and they (the Obama administration/Department of Education) prove it here”
  • “Students will accept Barack Obama as their Lord & Saviour”
  • “Does the speech make you want to do anything…besides kill yourself…”
  • “They’re going to make a whole freakin’ semester out of the President”

As you know from reading about his proclivity to falsely label President Obama the “antichrist,” DelGiorno lies to further his agenda (which, by the way, is to scare the living daylights out of his fellow Americans/Christians). He didn’t disappoint when yesterday he told his listeners that the President’s address will be broadcast to their kids directly to their classrooms – in secret over the internet – so parents won’t be able to watch it. Why not on TV?, he asked. Because, he said answering his own question, they don’t want you to know how they are indoctrinating your kids.

DELGIORNO: How do you feel, in general, about the President of the United States, while you’re at work, through a website and through the teachers, are going to talk to your kids…without you there…about something you don’t know what he’s going to do? About something you don’t know what they’re going to do in classroom? I thought it was interesting. He’s either really web-oriented….why not talk to them over television? Why the internet?
SIDEKICK: Or he views them much like the Muslims do, the Vanguard of the Future. [A nudge nudge wink wink to "socialism" and Hitler youth].
DELGIORNO: Takes a radical broad to say that. You got guts girl.
SIDEKICK: Thank you.

The truth is, the address will be available to anyone to watch on the White House website as well as on *Ta Dah* C-SPAN, which the last time I checked was TV. The address will also be streamed live online at C-SPAN.org, and on C-SPAN Radio (90.1 FM in Washington, D.C., and channel 132 on XM Satellite Radio)

The simple, easily-proven truth is easy to ignore when it can’t be used to further your fear-based conservative talk radio agenda, isn’t it?

Today, DelGiorno didn’t even bother prefacing his comments but he did add what I’m sure he thinks is a grand idea to his bile. An idea he so expertly pretended (like he pretends with all his ideas) to think up all on his own you could almost hear the fake light-bulb go on atop his head.

Instead of keeping your kids at home on Tuesday, he thought “spontaneously,” why not go to school with them? That’ll show ‘em (meaning principals and teachers), he said.

So DelGiorno is firing up parents with insinuations – that the government is trying to indoctrinate their kids into a Socialist Hitler-like Obama Youth (as I heard one parent-caller today describe it), that he is making them pledge their allegiance to the President (instead of the country), and that the government wants to whip up blind allegiance in you kids in the same way terrorists want to whip it up in theirs – and then sending them in that highly agitated state to your kids school.

Oh, have I mentioned that DelGiorno’s kids go to private school so he won’t have anything to worry about on Tuesday?

More irresponsible broadcasting from Michael DelGiorno and 99.7 WWTN. Listen to the whole clip here:

Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.

UPDATE:
History from Mark Brown of NoChaser and more from Woods at Pith in the Wind and TNDP chair Chip Forrester.

  • Share/Bookmark

Doing nothing is not an option.

Healthcare Ride to Reform Rally Tour – today!

Time:
Thursday, September 3 from 6:30 PM – 7:30 PM
Arrival time: 6:00 PM CDT
Program starts: 6:30 PM CDT

Location:
Allen Chapel AME Church
224 S Maney Ave
Murfreesboro, TN 37130
Google Map

Need a Ride?
(Bus Riders Should Be At The Stop By The 3pm! Space Will Go Fast On The Two Buses)
Bus Schedule – Thursday, September 3, 2009
3:15 – Vanderbilt-West End Methodist Church Parking Lot (2200 W End Ave)
3:30 – TSU- Airplane Display On TSU Campus
3:35 – Fisk- Gateway At 17th And Jackson
4:00 – 5:15 – Pre- Rally Rally In Church Sreet Park 600 Church St Nashville,TN (Across from Main Library)
5:15 – Depart For Murfreesboro, TN
6:20 – Arrive At The Event, Allen Chapel AME Church 224 S Maney Ave Murfreesboro, TN
6:30 – 8:00 – Let’s Get It Done Rally Event
8pm – Return To Nashville

For Info On The Bus And Accessibility Contact Tony Cani at 202-316-3141 or at TCani@tnchange.org

For Info On The Pre-Rally Contact Georgia Wendling at 615-308-1982 or Georgia.HCAN@comcast.net

For Info On The Allen Chapel Event Contact Ethan Link at 615-896-5771 or at ELink@TNchange.org

H/T: TNDP and Davidson County Young Democrats

  • Share/Bookmark
 
Look who joined the proofer movement!

Look who joined the proofer movement!

It’s been seventeen days since I last wrote to State Election Coordinator Mark Goins. I am still waiting for a reply.

Let’s start at the beginning.

In 2008, the Tennessee General Assembly passed the Tennessee Voter Confidence Act, which would have given Tennesseans four important elements to help ensure secure and verifiable elections:

1) Paper ballots
2) Removal of unverifiable paperless touch screen electronic voting machines to be replaced with optical scan machines (to count the paper ballots)
3) The paper ballot becomes the ballot of record in case of a recount. (The touch screen electronic voting system we have now only has one mechanism in place for a recount – press the same button again and get a repeat of the exact same totals you got before).
4) Mandatory random post-election audits in 3% of precincts (to insure that the Optical Scan machines are functioning properly).

During last session, Republicans tried to kill the Tennessee Voter Confidence Act, but when they couldn’t get that done they tried to delay it until 2012. The delay failed as well. Now, because they are left with no other option, Secretary of State Tre Hargett and State Election Coordinator Mark Goins, are simply refusing to implement the law.

In the early part of August, I was compared to a “birther” (people who don’t believe that President Obama is an American citizen) because a) I believe the Tennessee Voter Confidence Act could be implemented and the Republican Secretary of State is simply refusing to do so, and b) I don’t think any votes ever cast during any election using the 100% unverifiable electronic voting machines we use now in 93 out of 95 counties in Tennessee has ever been recorded accurately, as per the voters’ intent. Ever.

So, on August 10, 2009 I started Operation: P.O.P. (Please offer proof) – a.k.a. the “proofer” movement – in which I called on Secretary of State Hargett and State Election Coordinator Goins (who doesn’t think there’s anything wrong with the voting machines we use now) to present proof to the voters of Tennessee that one vote cast electronic voting machines has ever been recorded accurately.

I sent a letter to that effect to Mr. Hargett and Mr. Goins and two days later I received a reply from Mr. Goins. It was clear from his response that he either didn’t understand my request or couldn’t give me an answer. First, after making sure that I knew that he was not responsible for making the decision to purchase the 100% unverifiable electronic voting machines (“Decisions were made by the election commissions in each of those counties about what type of equipment to purchase”) he explained the testing procedure (“…the machines are tested prior to purchase, upon delivery and again before each election in each county…”) and suggested that I contact individual election administrators from each of the counties that use the 100% unverifiable electronic voting machines to witness testing procedures.

I felt nicely put off. But I did not feel as if my question has been answered. Perhaps I made it too confusing so I broke it down and sent him another email:

Dear Mr. Goins,

Thank you for getting back to me and for reiterating the need for election equipment that meets the highest standards for security and reliability. That said, the decision to purchase the electronic voting machines is in the past so I do not feel it necessary to address the county election commissioners at this time.

I do feel it necessary, however, to concentrate on the security and verifiability of the 2010 election.

And while I do believe your explanation of the bi-partisan pre-purchase testing procedure and the invitation to contact the election administrators to see demonstrations of each machine might address my request to see the process in which the votes are cast, it does not address my request to see the process in which the votes are cast and counted accurately.

In other words, I would like verification that the software used on these machines is both recording and counting accurately.

Do you have any suggestions on how this may be accomplished?

It seemed clear enough now, I thought. On election day, can Tre Hargett, Mark Goins, any poll worker, or poll monitor look into the internal bits of a touchscreen electronic voting machine and see how the votes are being counted? Can we, as voters, feel certain that what goes in the machine is going to be what comes out at the end of the day tally? Where’s the proof?

I couldn’t wait for his reply. But I had to wait. For two days.

Ms. Mancini:

Once again I want to thank you for your interest in the election process. I also want to apologize if my previous e-mail was unclear. The purpose of testing the voting machines prior to each election is to verify not only that ballots were cast, but also that they were properly tabulated and recorded. This testing process has been used in numerous elections prior to the start of my tenure with the Division of Elections and I’m unaware of any serious concerns expressed by the participating candidates or the parties they represented. However, if you have specific questions about the voting machine hardware or software, it might be advisable to contact officials with the companies that supply the equipment. I would be happy to supply some contact information for those companies, if you are interested.

Again, thank you for your inquiry.

Again with the “not my responsiblity.” Sheesh. So I tried one more time.

Dear Mr. Goins,

I am once again writing for clarification.

Are you suggesting that the testing done on the touch-screen machines prior to an election guarantees that every vote cast on election day on said machines will be counted and counted as cast?

If so, how can you be sure?

Do the companies that make the machines provide access to the counting software so that if can be verified and studied by your office? Can the companies that make the machines guarantee that the counting software is free of bugs, i.e. perfect and never makes mistakes during either the testing process or when they are live on election day? Can the companies that make the machines guarantee that the vote count cannot be manipulated in the source code or by introducing a virus in one of the unsecure data ports? Can the companies that make the machines guarantee that if one of the machines crashed or malfunctions, as computers are prone to do, that the votes on that machine will not be irretrievably lost? Can the companies also guarantee that each machine will be perfectly calibrated as to avoid vote flipping like the kind we saw last November?

Perhaps as the gentlemen in charge of building trust in our elections, you should contact the touch-screen electronic voting machine manufacturers for satisfactory answers to the above questions.

I also suggest that you read the following reports from the Brennan Center for Justice to better understand the serious concerns Tennesseans have about touch-screen electronic voting machines: http://www.brennancenter.org/content/section/category/voting_technology.

Or, you can simply look to the example of the Voter Confidence Act, which was passed almost unanimously in 2008 the State House and Senate by candidates who represent their political parties and recognized, as most of their constituents who want fair elections now do, the inherent unreliability and insecurity of touch-screen electronic voting machines.

Thank you again for your time.

The above email was sent on August 18. It’s September and I’ve yet to hear back from either State Election Coordinator Goins or Secretary of State Hargett.

Today I will resend my last email with the following addendum:

Dear Mr. Goins,

I am resending my email of August 18, 2009 in case it got lost in the flurry of emails you must receive on a daily basis. I look forward to your reply.

In addition, my offer for you to appear as a guest on Liberadio(!) with Mary Mancini & Freddie O’Connell to discuss the issue further, still stands.

More
Day 1: Operation P.O.P.
Day 2: Operation P.O.P.
Day 4: Operation P.O.P.
Another Proofer
Day 9: Operation P.O.P.
WPLN: Voting Machine Dispute Wears On as 2010 Election Nears
If You Hold an Election, Cheaters will Come
Computer Scientist Says Yes to Paper Ballots
Media (and some bloggers) missing the point of Tennessee election reform controversy

  • Share/Bookmark

The 57th District’s own Rep. Susan Lynn joins Glenn Beck and Sarah Palin, as Adele M. Stan describes at Alternet.org, in “blowing a kind of dog-whistle for the armed and paranoid who make up the right-wing, neo-militia ‘Patriot’ movement and the broader ‘Tea Party’ coalition.”

The nine words or phrases Stan cites that are “used by right-wing political and media figures as signals to the patriot and Tea Party constituencies” include the iconographic Don’t Tread on Me snake, the tree of liberty, patriot, tea party, 2nd Amendment, revolution, sovereign, 10th Amendment, and the government (as in, it’s bad all the time).

Rep. Lynn issued a press release yesterday that touts here signing of a “sovereignty” pledge issued by the “10 Amendment” Center in which she promises, among other things, that she will “introduce, sponsor and support legislation which refuses federal funding made on condition that my State comply with federal mandates not authorized by the Constitution.”

Government bad.

Christian Grantham, on hypocrisy watch, snarks it up:

Rep. Susan Lynn says she doesn’t like the federal government. Rep. Lynn joins a lot of interesting people across the country, like the guy in this video running for Governor of Texas who openly proclaims his hatred of the American flag and the federal government it represents.

Rep. Lynn might not realize that Tennessee is one of the fattest welfare queens of the federal government, sucking the wealth out of other states for Tennessee to the tune of $1.27 for every dollar sent to Washington so Rep. Lynn can ease the tax burden on her donors.

Rep. Lynn hasn’t explained where all those millions and millions of dollars would come from under her vision of state sovereignty, but let’s hope it doesn’t come in the form of “watering the liberty tree with blood” and praying the offering magically produces enough to pave roads and pay teachers, police, and firefighters.

All this makes one wonder, if Rep. Lynn believes government is so bad, why does she even want to govern?

More from No Chaser.

  • Share/Bookmark

Benintn writing for Daily Kos adds his thoughts about Jackson Day. Many of the attendees brought to their feet by Al Gore’s rousing speech were, he writes, “mostly Southerners – many from rural communities – many “Blue Dogs.” What does that mean? It means Tennesseans should stop spreading the prevailing myth of Southern domination by the Republican party:

We have a 5-4 majority of Democrats in Congress and a Democratic governor. (And while Gov. Phil Bredesen is hardly a radical, he is someone who has a lifelong connection to the Democratic Party and who understands the need for good government and effective leadership.)

Gore made two simple points: We have a moral obligation to provide care for the least of these, and it makes good business sense for us to manage our economy effectively.

That’ll preach – even in Tennessee.

Republicans in Tennessee have tried to play the Reagan game for too long now. As my state representative, Mike Turner, said earlier this year, “Republicans run for office complaining about how corrupt and ineffective the government is, and then they get into office and prove it.” The GOP strategy is simple – get members of our democracy to forget that we are the government, and make government into some scary “THEY”. (Then give big handouts to your corporate donors to make sure that you can buy more votes and fool more people.)

We might be rednecks, but we’re not stupid. Tennesseans don’t want to be talked down to, and they don’t want to be taken for granted. But our state still leans blue – and we want courageous leadership, not centrist waffling.

We also want clear, consistent messaging and Vice President Gore helped us with that as well:

But let me tell you one thing that really impressed me about the service today. They had a passage that had been written by Senator Kennedy about his religious faith. And he said that the center of his Christian faith was the Gospel of Matthew. And many of you know the famous passage that begins in chapter 25 where Jesus says to the gathering that, “You gave me food when I was hungry. You gave me water when I was thirsty. And when I was sick, you cared for me.” And they said, “Lord, Master, when did we do these things?” And he said, “When you did these things for the least among us, you did it for me.”

[Applause]

And let me tell you, we hear a lot of talk about liberal and conservative, and left and right, but let me tell you – ladies and gentlemen, when there are tens of millions of people – IN OUR COUNTRY – who cannot afford or get access to healthcare, WE HAVE A MORAL DUTY TO PASS HEALTHCARE REFORM. And we need to pass it this year.

  • Share/Bookmark
Tagged with:
 

Since Saturday night when President Bill Clinton called the Democratic Party the “party of how” during his energizing Jackson Day speech, I’ve been thinking of how Democrats, a.k.a. “The party that can govern because they believe in the good government,” can get their message about providing health security for all Americans and not just a select few heard over the constant barrage of lies from the “party of no,” a.k.a. the “Republican Party,” a.k.a. the “Party of we hate government so much that we can’t govern as you can see by the hand basket you’re all now in because of the last eight years of Republican rule.”

It seemed like an impossible task. Let’s face it, Republicans have both a consistent message and the means to disseminate. But today, after reading a column by Robert Reich with the following money quote (h/t Pith in the Wind’s Bruce Barry), I had what’s known (to me anyway) as a “Reichian Revelation.” I realized that for Tennessee Democrats, this is so much bigger and more important then getting out the message about health security for all:

The most important difference between America’s Democratic left and Republican right is that the left has ideas and the right has discipline. Obama and progressive supporters of health care were outmaneuvered in August — not because the right had any better idea for solving the health care mess but because the rights’ attack on the Democrats’ idea was far more disciplined than was the Democrats’ ability to sell it.”

With that in mind I have one word for you, Tennessee Democrats.

Just one word.

Are you listening?

Messaging Infrastructure.

OK, that’s two words. Whatever. The simple fact is that you need to build a messaging infrastructure and you need to build it fast.

What is a messaging infrastructure? It’s a consistent, simple message for every issue that will come up during the 2010 election cycle – jobs, education, healthcare, guns, gods, gays, etc.. Then, once you have your messaging infrastructure crafted, you must build a solid infrastructure with your members i.e. candidates, elected officials, party spokespeople, caucus leaders, executive committee members, county chairs, etc.. and they must all – every single one – use the same exact messaging. No exceptions.

You see, Reich is right. It’s about discipline. They have it. We don’t. And worse, we make excuses and jokes (Will Rogers, anyone?) about not having it.

Look at your counterparts across the aisle. Do the more moderate Republicans ever criticized the extremists? Do the extremists ever call the moderate members out for not supporting their more crazy legislative efforts? No and No.

Now, name me the three things Republicans stand for. Go on. You know you can. Are they specific? Are they nuanced? Are they freakin’ more than a couple of words each? No, no and hell no.

Senator Andy Berke was on the right track back in January of this year when he wrote in the Chattanooga Times Free Press:

If there is one fundamental, philosophical divide between Democrats and Republicans in our Legislature, it is over state government’s role in addressing these concerns. If you’re struggling in this economy, Republicans believe you’re on your own.

Democrats view things differently. Democrats believe we should use the tools of government to provide a platform of equal opportunity for all. While each individual’s success ultimately is his or her own responsibility, Democrats believe each individual’s likelihood of success will grow if we come together to provide good schools, safe neighborhoods, sound infrastructure and a clean environment.

Republicans: You’re on Your Own
Democrats: Equal Opportunity for All

Which sounds better? And what rural Democrat and his/her constituents wouldn’t be able to get behind it?

You have to do it and do it now. As President Clinton said last Saturday night, “Don’t stay on the defensive, play offense.”

And, I might add, the best offense is one where you don’t allow the other team to call you plays. In other words, stop using their terms to talk about important issues. (Yes, I’m talking to you Ty Cobb 2.0.)

More on Jackson Day from LeftWingCracker, Tom Humphrey of the Knoxville News Sentinel, Vibinc, Goldni, Southern Liberal Living, Sean Braisted, Rick Locker for Memphis Commericial Appeal, Left in Alabama, Southern Beale, Jeff Woods for the Nashville Scene, and Bill Nichols for Politico.

  • Share/Bookmark

I’ve already written a little about my own situation with regard to healthcare. I’m not particularly concerned, but let’s review the scenario:

I recently resigned from an employer to start a new business. Having a thorough personal understanding of the importance of health insurance (ranking it just underneath food and just ahead of rent/mortgage in terms of financial priorities), I planned to enroll in an individual plan. I also have a pre-existing condition, which makes any change to my insurance circumstances somewhat of a hurdle. So right now, I face:

  • getting approved for the individual plan for which I applied, albeit delayed while underwriters (at the same provider!) re-review my medical and health history because of my pre-existing condition, which has never resulted in the need for access to healthcare
  • or, getting denied for the individual plan for which I applied, forcing me to rely on COBRA, which not only is extremely expensive but also expires after 18 months

At the moment, my situation is not an emergency. It could become extremely expensive in the short term if I’m denied for the individual plan for which I applied, but I’m not too worried about being declared to be uninsurable, although that is a slight risk, as it is for all Americans. But is this health security?

And this brings me to my point. The primary reason we need health insurance reform in America right now is to ensure that Americans have adequate health security in a world with better diagnostics and rising healthcare costs. As life expectancy has increased, so has medical technology and information improved. We know more about chronic conditions now, and we have data that gives us a better grip on epidemiology. And there are epidemics. Everything from diabetes to cancer. And right now we operate in a world where, for most Americans, health insurance benefits are a function of employment and employers, and private insurers prefer working with groups rather than individuals, from among whom they’re quite satisfied cherry picking.

Here’s the thing about healthcare. Unless we achieve some type of actual health insurance reform, every single one of the 47 million uninsured Americans who is uninsured because they are uninsurable as designated by a private insurance company will continue to lack access to health insurance until they have spent down their assets–cash, house, investments–to poverty level, which allows them to qualify for Medicaid. They must then remain at a function of the federal poverty line– lest they become ineligible for Medicaid–until they qualify for Medicare at age 65. The alternative is to keep one’s assets and hope that one can just keep living long enough to survive visits to the emergency room when things get really terrible because that’s the only place that has a mandate, and the mandate is just to stabilize emergency conditions. And don’t forget: They’ll still bill you later.

So let’s be clear: Every American who gets an unexpected diagnosis just before changing jobs, or while covered under COBRA, lives with the extreme risk that they will lose access to insurance. Every American who actually has private insurance, maybe even likes their plan, might not realize that that plan likely carries a lifetime maximum in terms of what the policy covers. Maybe $1m. Maybe $5m. Or an annual maximum. Or a high enough deductible that, if an injury or illness preventing work occurs, might become punitive when extended across 30 years.

Our system of healthcare in America right now is the best in the world… for healthy Americans! For unhealthy Americans, it becomes a nearly guaranteed system of oppression. This is why some form of universal healthcare is a necessity. Because anything short of that is a systematic short circuit of the American dream for anyone who winds up injured or ill. This is why we’re all in this together. This is why we either need to pool our risk in a national consensus of some kind to ensure that no unhealthy American is left behind. Or we need a better idea that I haven’t yet heard.

So I want to hear from a Republican who opposes anything a Democrat proposes regarding health insurance reform: What do you say to the 47 million Americans without access to health insurance? What do you say to the hundreds of millions of Americans who are not independently wealthy and rely on meaningful health security to remain healthy and working? I get that you want to give ‘em all a tax credit. I get that. I’ve read John Mackey’s 8 Whole Foods Half Healthcare reforms that would lower costs, and not a single one of ‘em solves the problem of access to insurance when you’re uninsurable. So what else ya got, Republicans, because a tax credit ain’t gonna cut it in terms of keeping 47 million Americans out of poverty and ensuring that all Americans have health security. But I get this sneaking suspicion that you don’t actually care.

In the meantime, the Affordable Health Choices Act (in the Senate) and America’s Affordable Health Choices Act (in the House) provide an opportunity to expand health security to millions more Americans. Consider contacting Lamar Alexander, Bob Corker, and Jim Cooper and encouraging them to support these bills.

  • Share/Bookmark

Summary: Guest Reesa Webb and our Celebration of Health!

A Celebration of Health – Part 1 The “to do” list of upcoming healthcare rallies, excerpts from President Clinton’s Jackson Day speech, recap of Thirdrailcost.com symposium, why we need health security for all, the Little League World Series (USA!), a phone call from the world famous Dave Cloud, and the mainstream news media gets distracted by bright, shiny objects. [24MB download mp3]

Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.

A Celebration of Health – Part 2 Freddie shares his story on his current search for health security, we interview Reesa Webb, project director for John Snow, Inc. (the company contracted to assess the current delivery of health care to the medically underserved and indigent population in Nashville), “The Cause of My Life,” by Teddy Kennedy, your phone calls, and the discussion continues on why we need health security for all continues: choice, affordability, efficiency, accountability, and investment in our people. [21MB download mp3]

Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.

  • Share/Bookmark

Looking for something?

Use the form below to search the site:

Still not finding what you're looking for? Drop a comment on a post or contact us so we can take care of it!

Visit our friends!

A few highly recommended friends...