<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8220;Itâ€™s Not the Voting Thatâ€™s Democracy, itâ€™s the Counting.&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.liberadio.com/2009/06/19/it%e2%80%99s-not-the-voting-that%e2%80%99s-democracy-it%e2%80%99s-the-counting/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.liberadio.com/2009/06/19/it%e2%80%99s-not-the-voting-that%e2%80%99s-democracy-it%e2%80%99s-the-counting/</link>
	<description>with Mary Mancini &#38; Freddie O&#039;Connell</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2011 02:05:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Eric O'Daire</title>
		<link>http://www.liberadio.com/2009/06/19/it%e2%80%99s-not-the-voting-that%e2%80%99s-democracy-it%e2%80%99s-the-counting/comment-page-1/#comment-161436</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric O'Daire</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2009 12:12:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberadio.com/?p=4583#comment-161436</guid>
		<description>So how about Obama&#039;s reaction to the Iranian elections?  He&#039;s &quot;deeply concerned&quot; about where that nation is headed?  Give me a break!  First he goes over there and has a sweet little tea party with that douchebag Ahmadinejad, and then he wants to tell us that he is &quot;deeply concerned&quot;?  And since when has &quot;negotiating&quot; ever accomplished anything?  I say keep up the good work, Mr. Obama.  He&#039;s really making quite an example out of our country.  And by the way, did you know that Obama has gotten more publicity than President Clinton and President Bush combined?  That&#039;s just wonderful to idolize someone that much.  Way to go, mainstream media!  I guess our Lord and Saviour has finally arrived.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So how about Obama&#8217;s reaction to the Iranian elections?  He&#8217;s &#8220;deeply concerned&#8221; about where that nation is headed?  Give me a break!  First he goes over there and has a sweet little tea party with that douchebag Ahmadinejad, and then he wants to tell us that he is &#8220;deeply concerned&#8221;?  And since when has &#8220;negotiating&#8221; ever accomplished anything?  I say keep up the good work, Mr. Obama.  He&#8217;s really making quite an example out of our country.  And by the way, did you know that Obama has gotten more publicity than President Clinton and President Bush combined?  That&#8217;s just wonderful to idolize someone that much.  Way to go, mainstream media!  I guess our Lord and Saviour has finally arrived.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric O'Daire</title>
		<link>http://www.liberadio.com/2009/06/19/it%e2%80%99s-not-the-voting-that%e2%80%99s-democracy-it%e2%80%99s-the-counting/comment-page-1/#comment-161380</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric O'Daire</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 20:38:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberadio.com/?p=4583#comment-161380</guid>
		<description>So former President George W. Bush finally responded to all the mud thrown at him the previous five months.
In a speech before a local business group, Bush defended his policies regarding enhanced interrogation and rejected the idea of government-run health care. And later, he said the new White House dog sucks.
Well, that dog part isn&#039;t true, but it doesn&#039;t matter. Because I already know how this will be played by the media â€” a group who takes any criticism toward President Obama as a personal insult. I&#039;m sure right now Chris Matthews is hyperventilating in his Obama onesie.
But let&#039;s be clear: Bush has every right to talk about this stuff, since his beliefs exist beyond any current political strategy. So if he&#039;s asked about them, why not answer? After all, love him or hate him, his words reflect a philosophy that most people know to be true: That it&#039;s the people, not the government, who create wealth. And also that &quot;therapy&quot; won&#039;t &quot;cause terrorists to change their mind.&quot;
And lastly, Bush didn&#039;t start this war of words. Face it: For the past five months or so, Obama has been blaming Bush for everything from global warming to his lousy bowling.
But in the end, Bush still remains diplomatic. That&#039;s because he really wants Obama to succeed, because Obama is his president too â€” even if he can&#039;t bowl.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So former President George W. Bush finally responded to all the mud thrown at him the previous five months.<br />
In a speech before a local business group, Bush defended his policies regarding enhanced interrogation and rejected the idea of government-run health care. And later, he said the new White House dog sucks.<br />
Well, that dog part isn&#8217;t true, but it doesn&#8217;t matter. Because I already know how this will be played by the media â€” a group who takes any criticism toward President Obama as a personal insult. I&#8217;m sure right now Chris Matthews is hyperventilating in his Obama onesie.<br />
But let&#8217;s be clear: Bush has every right to talk about this stuff, since his beliefs exist beyond any current political strategy. So if he&#8217;s asked about them, why not answer? After all, love him or hate him, his words reflect a philosophy that most people know to be true: That it&#8217;s the people, not the government, who create wealth. And also that &#8220;therapy&#8221; won&#8217;t &#8220;cause terrorists to change their mind.&#8221;<br />
And lastly, Bush didn&#8217;t start this war of words. Face it: For the past five months or so, Obama has been blaming Bush for everything from global warming to his lousy bowling.<br />
But in the end, Bush still remains diplomatic. That&#8217;s because he really wants Obama to succeed, because Obama is his president too â€” even if he can&#8217;t bowl.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

