Keeping that Pesky Stork at Bay

Keeping that Pesky Stork at Bay

Freddie and I had a conversation on this morning’s show called, “Don’t they have anything better to do?,” in which we tried to figure out why Republicans, who are in complete control of both the Tennessee House and Senate for the first time since Reconstruction, have nothing better to do than introduce legislation that infringes on the reproductive health of women. Is that what Tennesseans voted them in to do, we asked? Or did we want something to be done about our bottom-of-the-barrel health, safety, and public service statistics?

Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.

You know what we mean. Every time a study is released that statistically ranks the states, Tennessee is always in the bottom half and most likely in the bottom third. For instance, Tennessee is 37th in Child Abuse Fatalities, 39th in Children in Poverty, 40th in High School Graduation, 48th in infant mortality, and 49th in violent crime

Well, we didn’t have to wait too long or look too far for answers. Colby Sledge gave us the skinny in today’s Tennessean – Rep. Mumpower and his wobbly majority have a culture war agenda and they’re not afraid to use it.

And so, tomorrow it begins. Resolutions HJR61 and HJR66 – proposed amendments that would constitutionally take away the right to abortion in Tennessee – will be heard at 4:00 p.m. in the House Public Health and Family Assistance Subcommittee.

So why are there two resolutions? Well, even though both begin with “Nothing in this Constitution secures or protects a right to abortion or requires the funding of an abortion,” HJR61 by Rep. Henry Fincher (D-Cookeville), calls for exceptions for rape, incest, and the heath of the mother and HJR66 by Rep. Debra Maggart (R-Hendersonville), does not. The Democrats call their bill “compromise legislation that they hope brings hot-button topics closer to the political center.” The Republicans say theirs is “not to lay the groundwork to ban abortion altogether, but rather to begin efforts to restore regulations rendered null and void” by a 2000 ruling by the Tennessee Supreme Court affirming a woman’s right to private health care decisions.

Since 2001, this kind of resolution, which has passed 4 times in the Senate, has failed in the House subcommittee. But Democrats no longer control the committee – it’s now split 4-4 – and newly-crowned Speaker of the House and legislative committee tie-breaker Kent Williams (R-Elizabethton) has said he would swing his mighty gavel and vote to pass the anti-abortion resolution – without the exceptions.

A pox on you Speaker Williams.

And a double-pox on you Rep. Maggart. “No exceptions?” How did you even conceive of “no exceptions?” I must request verification that you are, indeed, a woman because sponsoring legislation like this as a woman can get you kicked out of “the club.” And while we’re at it, I’d like to see your birth certificate, too.

More disturbing still is that both the Democrats and Republicans know that a Constitutional amendment – with or without exceptions – will do nothing to reduce the number of abortions performed in Tennessee. Which begs the question, are they really looking to do that?

Did you know that although Tennessee is ranked 20th in providing family planning public funding (publicly supported contraceptive services and supplies), we’re ranked 42nd in family planning laws and policies (whether laws and policies are likely to facilitate access to contraceptive services and information), 30th in family planning service availability (how well states meet existing need for subsidized contraceptive services and supplies), and 40th in births to teen mothers ages 15-19.

Disconnect, much? If the members of the Tennessee legislature wanted real solutions, they would do two things. First, they’d be honest and admit that there are already a number of Tennessee laws which regulate abortion – including parental consent, a ban on late-term abortions and patient informed consent. Then, they would focus on researching and providing the most effective education and resources that would actually, you know, reduce the number of unintended pregnancies.

Between now and 4:00 PM tomorrow, please members of the House Public Health and Family Assistance Subcommittee as well as your state representatives, and ask them to put their valuable time and energy into real solutions for Tennessee’s problems.

Tell’em the newly enlightened Sarah Palin and her daughter, Bristol, sent you.

UPDATE: Today’s meeting of the subcommittee has been postponed. They will reschedule to hear all bills pertaining to reproductive health rights at one time. I will keep you posted.

  • Share/Bookmark
Tagged with:
 

9 Responses to “Proposing a Constitutional Amendment to Infringe on Women’s Reproductive Health is Not A Solution”

  1. [...] previously discussed, these resolutions are the first step toward amending the Tennessee State Constitution to take away [...]

  2. [...] about the absolute need for exceptions in any law pertaining to reproductive health choices and better legislative options for addressing the issue of abortion – like preventing unwanted pregnancies by providing education [...]

  3. [...] Camper (D-Memphis, the itchin’ for a Fight in the 87th) has proposed House Resolution HJR132 in response to HJR61 by Rep. Henry Fincher (D-Cookeville) and the heath of the mother and HJR66 by Rep. Debra [...]

  4. Elmer Gantry says:

    also check out HB0862

  5. Elmer Gantry says:

    Abortion Not Seen Linked With Depression
    Review of 21 Studies Shows No Proof of Mental Distress After Abortion
    http://abcnews.go.com/Health/DepressionNews/wireStory?id=6389566
    December 4, 2008

    Reuters

    WASHINGTON

    No high-quality study done to date can document that having an abortion causes psychological distress, or a “post-abortion syndrome,” and efforts to show it does occur appear to be politically motivated, U.S. researchers said on Thursday.

    A team at Johns Hopkins University in Baltimore reviewed 21 studies involving more than 150,000 women and found the high-quality studies showed no significant differences in long-term mental health between women who choose to abort a pregnancy and others.

    “The best research does not support the existence of a ‘post-abortion syndrome’ similar to post-traumatic stress disorder,” Dr. Robert Blum, who led the study published in the journal Contraception, said in a statement.

    “Based on the best available evidence, emotional harm should not be a factor in abortion policy. If the goal is to help women, program and policy decisions should not distort science to advance political agendas,” added Vignetta Charles, a researcher and doctoral student at Johns Hopkins who worked on the study.

    An estimated 1.29 million American women get elective abortions each year, according to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. An estimated 25 million women globally have legal abortions every year.

    (…)

    “The U.S. Supreme Court, while noting that ‘we find no reliable data to measure the phenomenon,’ cited adverse mental health outcomes for women as part of the rationale for limiting late term abortions,” Blum’s team wrote.

    The researchers reviewed all English-language, peer-reviewed publications between 1989 and 2008 that studied relationships between abortion and long-term mental health.

    They analyzed those that included valid mental health measures and factored in pre-existing mental health status and potentially confusing factors.

    “The best quality studies indicate no significant differences in long-term mental health between women in the United States who choose to terminate a pregnancy and those who do not,” they wrote.

    “…studies with the most flawed methodology consistently found negative mental health consequences of abortion,” they added. “Scientists are still conducting research to answer politically motivated questions.”

  6. Elmer Gantry says:

    Hmmm…apparently lot of Abortion Alternatives of Elizabethton time is spent “teaching” within the Carter County School System (Speaker Kent Williams cousin Dallas? is the Carter County School Superintendent; the Elizabethton City Schools do not allow Abortion Alternatives of Elizabethton to “teach” within the city school) — and I was thinking the maybe the Director of Abortion Alternatives of Elizabethton would be required to have a state license to teach within the Carter County School System…

  7. Elmer Gantry says:

    The news media has not yet reported that Speaker Kent Williams’ wife is a long-time board member of Abortion Alternatives of Elizabethton wherein she has served as the Secretary at least since 2005 – along with the 2007 press reports of Rep. Kent Williams awarding $18,000 (out of a $100,000 Community Enhancement Grant for his Carter County House District):

    Tennessee Secretary of State
    http://www.state.tn.us/sos/forms/ss-0100.pdf
    (I would really see the SOS file pertaining to all of the Carter County applicants for Rep. Kent Williams’ 2007 Community Enhancement Grant funding…and learn of which Carter County applicants were passed over by Rep. Williams…)

    ABORTION ALTERNATIVES AND WOMENS CENTER
    (Guidestar.org reports)
    416 S SYCAMORE ST
    ELIZABETHTON , TN 37643
    http://www.guidestar.org/pqShowGsReport.do?npoId=100203197

    GENERAL INFORMATION

    Who We Are

    TO PROVIDE COUNSELING, EDUCATION, AND SUPPORT IN THE AREAS OF ABSTINENCE, PRE-NATAL CARE, ADOPTION, CHILD REARING, AND POST-ABORTION DEPRESSION WITH AN OVERALL GOAL OF AVOIDING ABORTIONS.

  8. [...] local radio program Liberadio! informs us that “The Democrats call their bill ‘compromise legislation that they hope [...]

Leave a Reply




Looking for something?

Use the form below to search the site:

Still not finding what you're looking for? Drop a comment on a post or contact us so we can take care of it!

Visit our friends!

A few highly recommended friends...