The politics of censorship
According to New America Foundation Middle East and Energy Policy expert and former government official Flynt Leverett, the white house has “forced the CIA to heavily censor a 1000 word op-ed” he planned for the New York Times titled “Dealing with Tehran: Assessing US Diplomatic Options Toward Iran.”
Leverett asserts that the White House is now politicizing the “secrets review” process - “a process that is supposed to be about the protection of classified information, and nothing else” - and is “rewarding those who support Bush’s policies and punishing those don’t.”
He has cheerfully submitted everything’s he’s written before to the review board and not a word has ever been censored. Until now.
Much of what was in his piece was also in a piece written by administration supporter, Kenneth Pollack, another former CIA employee, cleared by the review board, and published.
“It would seem that,” Leverett writes, ” if one is expounding views congenial to the White House, it does not intervene in prepublication censorship, but, if one is a critic, White House officials will use fraudulent charges of revealing classified information to keep critical views from being heard.”

Add A Comment