<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: If I Were a High-Paid Democratic Consultant</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.liberadio.com/2006/01/17/if-i-were-a-high-paid-democratic-consultant/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.liberadio.com/2006/01/17/if-i-were-a-high-paid-democratic-consultant/</link>
	<description>with Mary Mancini &#38; Freddie O&#039;Connell</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2011 02:05:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Freddie</title>
		<link>http://www.liberadio.com/2006/01/17/if-i-were-a-high-paid-democratic-consultant/comment-page-1/#comment-96</link>
		<dc:creator>Freddie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2006 00:07:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberadio.com/2006/01/16/if-i-were-a-high-paid-democratic-consultant/#comment-96</guid>
		<description>Why did I write this post? An excerpt from Friday&#039;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/TheNote/story?id=1527508&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Note&lt;/a&gt; gives some indication:

&lt;blockquote&gt;
As for the Democrats, they can be confident of exactly one thing:

Republicans are (still) from Mars and Democrats are (still) from Venus.

How else to explain Senator Harry Reid&#039;s (D-NV) extraordinary apology yesterday to his Republican colleagues?

Last year Democrats laughed and laughed when George Bush was unable to think of a single mistake he had made as President. Today Republicans are quadrupled over in hysterics because of Harry Reid&#039;s apology to his Senate Republican colleagues for sending out a negative research document from his office.

Failure to find weapons of mass destruction? No apology required. Nasty research document? A thousand pardons please.

And that different approach sums up the difference between the two parties: as effective as Manley/Singer/Cutter have been in their war rooms, the Democratic Party leadership still has not internalized the rules of modern politics at a time of war and terror in the way the GOP has.

(Of course, the Republicans are right: why didn&#039;t Reid&#039;s operation have that sent out by the DNC or the DSCC?)
&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why did I write this post? An excerpt from Friday&#8217;s <a href="http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/TheNote/story?id=1527508" rel="nofollow">Note</a> gives some indication:</p>
<blockquote><p>
As for the Democrats, they can be confident of exactly one thing:</p>
<p>Republicans are (still) from Mars and Democrats are (still) from Venus.</p>
<p>How else to explain Senator Harry Reid&#8217;s (D-NV) extraordinary apology yesterday to his Republican colleagues?</p>
<p>Last year Democrats laughed and laughed when George Bush was unable to think of a single mistake he had made as President. Today Republicans are quadrupled over in hysterics because of Harry Reid&#8217;s apology to his Senate Republican colleagues for sending out a negative research document from his office.</p>
<p>Failure to find weapons of mass destruction? No apology required. Nasty research document? A thousand pardons please.</p>
<p>And that different approach sums up the difference between the two parties: as effective as Manley/Singer/Cutter have been in their war rooms, the Democratic Party leadership still has not internalized the rules of modern politics at a time of war and terror in the way the GOP has.</p>
<p>(Of course, the Republicans are right: why didn&#8217;t Reid&#8217;s operation have that sent out by the DNC or the DSCC?)
</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

